Feature Requests

I previously had a survey I used to request testimonials, and it had three questions. basically, what product are you reviewing, rating, and comments. (It was a survey so it automatically knew the contact's name and email.) Now, the request testimonial form has way more extra fields, and to me they look like they're in a weird order. For example: when I'm asked to leave a review for anything, the first question I am always asked for is a numerical review (i.e. 5 stars), but on the testimonial form, it's literally the last field, and it's the ONLY field that is labelled as "Optional." Many of the other fields are optional, so why draw attention to the fact that Rating is optional? Also, why isn't it the first field? Why isn't it higher up than, say, the attachment field which I would consider the most optional? For example: why is "author image" taking up so much space, and why is it so high up on the form? I'd like to disable that field, along with "your title" and "link to your website." I recognize that some other users would find those valuable, but to me those look like clutter. Simplero contact profiles can have urls attached to them already, and also, I already have a custom contact field for "job title" which I collect on the order form, so it seems like it would be a nicer experience for the end-user if I could already port this in from the contact. Can we customize the testimonials form please? I love that it exists but I think I would get a ton more people willing to leave a review/testimonial if it was easier for them to do so, and that includes making the form more streamlined.

This should be a General Feature for all lists (with the remaining ability to toggle it individually for each list).

It would be great to have an option to display quizzes AFTER the written/visual lesson content. For example, a user can work through the lesson and THEN test their learning on the same page/lesson. This seems much more logical for a user flow and for keeping lessons/quizzes/worksheets together. You can already do this with worksheets on lessons, where you have copy written above the embedded worksheet, so it would be good to have the same for quizzes. (see example attached!)

Hey team I have many of my clients who doesn't want "simplerosites" as part of their URL on their membersites - I know this can be fixed via custom domains, but on the scale plan we only have 3. Could there be some sort of workaround that makes the sites fall under the mainsite domain, and thereby not have the need to set up several (sub)domains. But when we add a site we can choose to lay it under the main site domain, kind of like the funnels where the pages in the funnels are URL'ed in this way: maindomain.com/FUNNEL-NAME/FUNNEL-PAGE-NAME So if sites could be made in the same structure: maindomain.com/SITE-NAME/SITE-PAGE-NAME It would solve a lot of the hassle with the need for many custom domains. And then maybe have a toggle to create the site on it's own domain, for the cases where you want it on it's own separate domain. Thanks Sarah

Can we have a toggle or method to allow users to submit their testimonials showing publicly as anonymous? The user COULD enter their name as 'Anonymous' but most won't realise this is possible without instruction (and the simpler/more obvious we can make it the better!). Several of my clients work in the health and wellbeing industry and whilst their customers are happy to share their feedback with my clients, MOST of those want us to share anonymously when we add to our websites/social media. To be clear, we don't want feedback to be anonymous for the Simplero admins - just on the front end/public facing. A toggle on the form that says 'show as Anonymous' or 'hide my name' or something else that makes sense to the customer when completing the testimonial form would be great!

Please make it possible to add a condition participant ON a specific date or month when creating a segment. Not "or before/after". Just ON.

Hi. Could we please go back to the old way of showing notes in automations? The current display and layout of notes within the new Automations interface make it difficult to get a quick and easy overview of the automation flow, especially when using notes for detailed explanations. We request a return to a more integrated and space-efficient way of displaying notes, or an implementation of a new design that addresses the current limitations. --- ### Current Problem While the new Automations layout is generally acceptable, the current implementation of notes, displayed as yellow speech bubbles, presents several issues: Poor Use of Space: Notes, particularly longer ones, take up excessive vertical space . The width of the note is too narrow , forcing text onto multiple lines and making the overall automation sequence look long and cluttered. Lack of Readability: The text within the notes is very small , and any links added within the note are not clickable , reducing their utility. Disjointed View: The notes exist as separate elements (speech bubbles) and feel disconnected from the actual step they are referencing, which complicates a quick, logical review of the automation. It feels like they are all over the place and you can't quicky skim through the automation because your eyes has to switch focus all the time. --- ### Proposed Solution It would be nice if you could integrating the notes directly into the automation step they are attached to (as in the old days 😅), utilizing the full width of the step, as follows: * Integration: Instead of a separate yellow speech bubble, the note should be displayed inside the actual automation step. * Collapsible Design: Implement a collapsible section for the note: * Initially, only show the first one or two lines of the note to provide brief context. * Include a mechanism (e.g., a "..." icon or a small arrow) to expand and collapse the full note content as needed. * Full-Width Utilization: By integrating the note into the step, it would utilize the full available width of the automation step for the text field, drastically reducing the need for excessive vertical scrolling due to line wraps. * Functionality Improvement: Ensure that any links within the note are fully clickable. --- ### Expected Benefits This change would significantly improve the user experience and efficiency when building and reviewing automations: * Better Overview: A much cleaner, less cluttered interface, making it easier to follow the automation logic at a glance. * Improved Readability: Notes would be easier to read due to better text sizing and the use of the full step width. * Increased Utility: The ability to use clickable links in notes would allow for easy cross-referencing to documentation or external resources. --- The above if for action/mail steps etc. The speach bubble works fine for waitsteps. Because a wait step naturally already are separating the action/mail steps. Thank you very much Siif (image attached of the new and old notes)

Hey team Just wanting to flag that I would love to have more custom design options to the embedded forms - if it could be somewhat similar in the building format as we have on the page builder + having it pull from the style guide then that would be AMAZING. Right now we can't even decide the curving of the corners on the button or input fields. I have a number of clients who have their primary website out of Simplero, and want to add embedded forms to their sites that signs their clients up for newsletters, mailing lists etc. I'm sure it's not a quick fix, but would love to have it on your radar. Thanks Sarah

In the Page Builder 2.0, you can add a Testimonials block. The current filter options are: All published (in which you can limit the total number displayed) By product By label Specific I would like to be able to display by product or by label, and also limit to only show X number. Right now you can only limit if you're displaying all published, or of course if you manually select X testimonials.

It would be great if we could customize the testimonial widget with our brand styles (colors, fonts, etc.). And have a choice of star colors, too! I prefer gold to green. :)